The Crown Temple
By Rule of Mystery Babylon
by Michael Edward of the Ecclesiastic Commonwealth Community (ECC)
The Templars of the Crown
The governmental and judicial
systems within the United States of America, at both federal and local state
levels, is owned by the “Crown,” which is a private foreign power. Before
jumping to conclusions about the Queen of England or the Royal Families of
Britain owning the U.S.A., this is a different “Crown” and is fully exposed and
explained below. We are specifically referencing the established Templar
Church, known for centuries by the world as the “Crown.” From this point on, we
will also refer to the Crown as the Crown Temple or Crown Templar, all three
First, a little historical background. The Temple Church was built by the
Knights Templar in two parts: the Round and the Chancel. The Round Church was
consecrated in 1185 and modeled after the circular Church of the Holy Sepulchre
in Jerusalem. The Chancel was built in 1240. The Temple Church serves both the
Inner and Middle Temples (see below) and is located between Fleet Street and
Victoria Embankment at the Thames River. Its grounds also house the Crown
Offices at Crown Office Row. This Temple “Church” is outside any Canonical
jurisdiction. The Master of the Temple is appointed and takes his place by
sealed (non-public) patent, without induction or institution.
All licensed Bar Attorneys - Attorners (see definitions below) – in the U.S.
owe their allegiance and give their solemn oath in pledge to the Crown Temple,
realizing this or not. This is simply due to the fact that all Bar Associations
throughout the world are signatories and franchises to the international Bar
Association located at the Inns of Court at Crown Temple, which are physically
located at Chancery Lane behind Fleet Street in London. Although they
vehemently deny it, all Bar Associations in the U.S., such as the American Bar
Association, the Florida Bar, or California Bar Association, are franchises to
The Inns of Court (see below, The Four Inns of Court) to the Crown Temple use
the Banking and Judicial system of the City of London - a sovereign and
independent territory which is not a part of Great Britain (just as Washington
City, as DC was called in the 1800’s, is not a part of the north American
states, nor is it a state) to defraud, coerce, and manipulate the American
people. These Fleet Street bankers and lawyers are committing crimes in America
under the guise and color of law (see definitions for legal and lawful below).
They are known collectively as the “Crown.” Their lawyers are actually Templar
Bar Attornies, not lawyers.
The present Queen of England is not the “Crown,” as we have all been led to
believe. Rather, it is the Bankers and Attornies (Attorneys) who are the actual
Crown or Crown Temple. The Monarch aristocrats of England have not been ruling
sovereigns since the reign of King John, circa 1215. All royal sovereignty of
the old British Crown since that time has passed to the Crown Temple in
The U.S.A. is not the free and sovereign nation that our federal government
tells us it is. If this were true, we would not be dictated to by the Crown
Temple through its bankers and attornies. The U.S.A. is controlled and
manipulated by this private foreign power and our unlawful Federal U.S.
Government is their pawn broker. The bankers and Bar Attorneys in the U.S.A.
are a franchise in oath and allegiance to the Crown at Chancery - the Crown
Temple Church and its Chancel located at Chancery Lane - a manipulative body of
elite bankers and attorners from the independent City of London who violate the
law in America by imposing fraudulent “legal” - but totally unlawful -
contracts on the American people. The banks Rule the Temple Church and the
Attorners carry out their Orders by controlling their victim’s judiciary.
Since the first Chancel of the Temple Church was built by the Knights Templar,
this is not a new ruling system by any means. The Chancel, or Chancery, of the
Crown Inner Temple Court was where King John was, in January 1215, when the
English barons demanded that he confirm the rights enshrined in the Magna
Carta. This City of London Temple was the headquarters of the Templar Knights
in Great Britain where Order and Rule were first made, which became known as
Code. Remember all these terms, such as Crown, Temple, Templar, Knight,
Chancel, Chancery, Court, Code, Order and Rule as we tie together their origins
with the present American Temple Bar system of thievery by equity (chancery)
“Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited
sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead
men's bones, and of all uncleanness.”
By what authority has the “Crown” usurped the natural sovereignty of the
American people? Is it acceptable that the U.S. Supreme Court decides
constitutional issues in the U.S.A? How can it be considered in any manner as
being “constitutional” when this same Supreme Court is appointed by (not
elected) and paid by the Federal U.S. Government? As you will soon see, the
land called North America belongs to the Crown Temple.
The legal system (judiciary) of the U.S.A. is controlled by the Crown Temple
from the independent and sovereign City of London. The private Federal Reserve
System, which issues fiat U.S. Federal Reserve Notes, is financially owned and
controlled by the Crown from Switzerland, the home and legal origin for the
charters of the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, the World
Trade Organization, and most importantly, the Bank of International
Settlements. Even Hitler respected his Crown bankers by not bombing
Switzerland. The Bank of International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland
controls all the central banks of the G7 nations. He who controls the gold
rules the world.
you never knew:
ATTORN [e-'tern] Anglo-French aturner to transfer (allegiance of a tenant to
another lord), from Old French atorner to turn (to), arrange, from a- to +
torner to turn: to agree to be the tenant of a new landlord or owner of the
same property. Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law ©1996.
ATTORN, v.i. [L. ad and torno.] In the feudal law, to turn, or transfer
homage and service from one lord to another. This is the act of feudatories,
vassels or tenants, upon the alienation of the estate.-Webster’s 1828
ESQUIRE, n [L. scutum, a shield; Gr. a hide, of which shields were
anciently made.], a shield-bearer or armor-bearer, scutifer; an attendant on a
knight. Hence in modern times, a title of dignity next in degree below a
knight. In England, this title is given to the younger sons of noblemen, to
officers of the king's courts and of the household, to counselors at law,
justices of the peace, while in commission, sheriffs, and other gentlemen. In
the United States, the title is given to public officers of all degrees, from
governors down to justices and attorneys.-Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.
RULE, n. [L. regula, from rego, to govern, that is, to stretch, strain
or make straight.] 1. Government; sway; empire; control; supreme command or
authority. 6. In monasteries, corporations or societies, a law or regulation to
be observed by the society and its particular members. -Webster’s 1828
RULE n. 1 [C] a statement about what must or should be done, (syn.) a
REGULATION n. 1 [C] a rule, statement about what can be done and what
cannot. 2 [U] the general condition of controlling any part of human life.
-Newbury House Dictionary ©1999.
CODE n. 1 [C;U] a way of hiding the true meaning of communications from
all except those people who have the keys to understand it. 2 [C] a written set
of rules of behavior. 3 [C] a formal group of principles or laws. -v. coded,
coding, codes to put into code, (syn.) to encode.ENCODE v. 1 to change written
material into secret symbols. -Newbury House Dictionary ©1999.
CURTAIN n. [OE. cortin, curtin, fr. OF. cortine, curtine, F. courtine,
LL. cortina, also, small court, small inclosure surrounded by walls, from
cortis court. See Court.] 4 A flag; an ensign; -- in contempt. [Obs.] Shak.
Behind the curtain, in concealment; in secret. -1913 Webster's Revised
COURT, n. 3. A palace; the place of residence of a king or sovereign prince.
5. Persons who compose the retinue or council of a king or emperor. 9. The
tabernacle had one court; the temple, three. -Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.
COURT n. 2 the place where a king or queen lives or meets others. -The
Newbury House Dictionary ©1999.
TEMPLAR, n. [from the Temple, a house near the Thames, which originally
belonged to the knights Templars. The latter took their denomination from an
apartment of the palace of Baldwin II in Jerusalem, near the temple.] 1. A
student of the law. -Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.
TEMPLE, n. [L. templum.] 1. A public edifice erected in honor of some
deity. Among pagans, a building erected to some pretended deity, and in which
the people assembled to worship. Originally, temples were open places, as the
Stonehenge in England. 4. In England, the Temples are two inns of court, thus
called because anciently the dwellings of the knights Templars. They are called
the Inner and the Middle Temple. -Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.
CAPITOL, n. 1. The temple of Jupiter in Rome, and a fort or castle, on
the Mons Capitolinus. In this, the Senate of Rome anciently assembled; and on
the same place, is still the city hall or town-house, where the conservators of
the Romans hold their meetings. The same name was given to the principal temples
of the Romans in their colonies.
INN, n. [Hebrew, To dwell or to pitch a tent.] 2. In England, a college
of municipal or common law professors and students; formerly, the town-house of
a nobleman, bishop or other distinguished personage, in which he resided when
he attended the court. Inns of court, colleges in which students of law reside
and are instructed. The principal are the Inner Temple, the Middle Temple,
Lincoln's Inn, and Gray's Inn. Inns of chancery, colleges in which young
students formerly began their law studies. These are now occupied chiefly by
attorneys, solicitors, etc.
INNER, a. [from in.] Interior; farther inward than something else, as an
inner chamber; the inner court of a temple or palace. -Webster’s 1828
CROWN, n. 4. Imperial or regal power or dominion; sovereignty. There is
a power behind the crown greater than the crown itself. Junius. 19. A coin
stamped with the image of a crown; hence, a denomination of money; as, the
English crown. -- Crown land, land belonging to the crown, that is, to the
sovereign. -- Crown law, the law which governs criminal prosecutions. -- Crown
lawyer, one employed by the crown, as in criminal cases. v.t. 1. To cover,
decorate, or invest with a crown; hence, to invest with royal dignity and
power. -1913 Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary.
COLONY, n. 1. A company [i.e. legal corporation] or body of people
transplanted from their mother country to a remote province or country to
cultivate and inhabit it, and remaining subject to the jurisdiction of the
parent state; as the British colonies in America or the Indies; the Spanish
colonies in South America. -Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.
STATE, n. [L., to stand, to be fixed.] 1. Condition; the circumstances
of a being or thing at any given time. These circumstances may be internal,
constitutional or peculiar to the being, or they may have relation to other
beings. 4. Estate; possession. [See Estate.] -Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.
ESTATE, n. [L. status, from sto, to stand. The roots stb, std and stg,
have nearly the same signification, to set, to fix. It is probable that the L.
sto is contracted from stad, as it forms steti.] 1. In a general sense,
fixedness; a fixed condition; 5. Fortune; possessions; property in general. 6.
The general business or interest of government; hence, a political body; a
commonwealth; a republic. But in this sense, we now use State. ESTATE, v.t. To
settle as a fortune. 1. To establish. -Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.
PATENT, a. [L. patens, from pateo, to open.] 3. Appropriated by letters
patent. 4. Apparent; conspicuous. PATENT, n. A writing given by the proper
authority and duly authenticated, granting a privilege to some person or
persons. By patent, or letters patent, that is, open letters, the king of Great
Britain grants lands, honors and franchises.
PATENT, v.t. To grant by patent. 1. To secure the exclusive right of a
thing to a person
LAWFUL. In accordance with the law of the land; according to the law;
permitted, sanctioned, or justified by law. "Lawful" properly implies
a thing conformable to or enjoined by law; "Legal", a thing in the
form or after the manner of law or binding by law. A writ or warrant issuing
from any court, under color of law, is a "legal" process however
defective. – A Dictionary of Law 1893.
LEGAL. Latin legalis. Pertaining to the understanding, the exposition,
the administration, the science and the practice of law: as, the legal
profession, legal advice; legal blanks, newspaper. Implied or imputed in law.
Opposed to actual. "Legal" looks more to the letter, and
"Lawful" to the spirit, of the law. "Legal" is more
appropriate for conformity to positive rules of law; "Lawful" for
accord with ethical principle. "Legal" imports rather that the forms
of law are observed, that the proceeding is correct in method, that rules
prescribed have been obeyed; "Lawful" that the right is actful in
substance, that moral quality is secured. "Legal" is the antithesis
of "equitable", and the equivalent of "constructive". - 2
Abbott's Law Dict. 24; A Dictionary of Law (1893).
STATUS IN QUO, STATUS QUO. [L., state in which.] The state in which
anything is already. The phrase is also used retrospectively, as when, on a
treaty of place, matters return to the status quo ante bellum, or are left in
statu quo ante bellum, i.e., the state (or, in the state) before the war.
-1913 Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary
Inns of Court to the unholy Temple
Globally, all the legalistic scams promoted
by the exclusive monopoly of the Temple Bar and their Bar Association
franchises come from four Inns or Temples of Court: the Inner Temple, the Middle Temple, Lincoln's Inn, and Gray's Inn. These
Inns/Temples are exclusive and private country clubs; secret societies of world
power in commerce. They are well established, some having been founded in the
early 1200’s. The Queen and Queen Mother of England are current members of both
the Inner Temple and Middle Temple. Gray’s Inn specializes in Taxation
legalities by Rule and Code for the Crown. Lincoln’s Inn received its name from
the Third Earl of Lincoln (circa 1300).
Just like all U.S. based franchise Bar Associations, none of the Four Inns of
the Temple are incorporated - for a definite and purposeful reason: You can’t
make claim against a non-entity and a non-being. They are private societies
without charters or statutes, and their so-called constitutions are based
solely on custom and self-regulation. In other words, they exist as secret
societies without a public “front door” unless you’re a private member called
to their Bar.
While the Inner Temple holds the legal system franchise by license to steal
from Canada and Great Britain, it is the Middle Temple that has legal license
to steal from America. This comes about directly via their Bar Association
franchises to the Honourable Society of the Middle Temple through the Crown
From THE HISTORY OF THE INN, Later Centuries, [p.6], written by the Honourable
Society of the Middle Temple, we can see a direct tie to the Bar Association
franchises and its Crown signatories in America:
“Call to the Bar or keeping terms in one of the four Inns a pre-requisite to
Call at King's Inns until late in the 19th century. In the 17th and 18th
centuries, students came from the American colonies and from many of the West
Indian islands. The Inn's records would lead one to suppose that for a time
there was hardly a young gentleman in Charleston who had not studied here. Five
of the signatories to the Declaration of Independence were Middle Templars, and
notwithstanding it and its consequences, Americans continued to come here until
the War of 1812”.
All Bar Association licensed Attorneys must keep the terms of their oath to the
Crown Temple in order to be accepted or “called to Bar” at any of the King’s
Inns. Their oath, pledge, and terms of allegiance are made to the Crown Temple.
It’s a real eye opener to know that the Middle Inn of the Crown Temple has
publicly acknowledged there were at least five Templar Bar Attornies, under
solemn oath only to the Crown, who signed what was alleged to be an American
Declaration of Independence. This simply means that both parties to the
Declaration agreement were of the same origin, the Crown Temple. In case you
don’t understand the importance of this, there is no international agreement or
treaty that will ever be honored, or will ever have lawful effect, when the
same party signs as both the first and second parties. It’s merely a worthless
piece of paper with no lawful authority when both sides to any agreement are
actually the same. In reality, the American Declaration of Independence was
nothing more than an internal memo of the Crown Temple made among its private
By example, Alexander Hamilton was one of those numerous Crown Templars who was
called to their Bar. In 1774, he entered King's College in New York City, which
was funded by members of the London King’s Inns, now named Columbia University.
In 1777, he became a personal aide and private secretary to George Washington
during the American Revolution.
In May of 1782, Hamilton began studying law in Albany, New York, and within six
months had completed a three year course of studies, passed his examinations,
and was admitted to the New York Bar. Of course, the New York Bar Association
was/is a franchise of the Crown Temple through the Middle Inn. After a year's
service in Congress during the 1782-1783 session, he settled down to legal
practice in New York City as Alexander Hamilton, Esqr. In February of 1784, he
wrote the charter for, and became a founding member of, the Bank of New York, the
State's first bank.
He secured a place on the New York delegation to the Federal Convention of 1787
at Philadelphia. In a five hour speech on June 18th, he stated “an Executive
for life will be an elective Monarch”. When all his anti-Federalist New York
colleagues withdrew from the Convention in protest, he alone signed the
Constitution for the United States of America representing New York State, one
of the legal Crown States (Colonies).
One should particularly notice that a lawful state is made up of the people,
but a State is a legal entity of the Crown - a Crown Colony. This is an example
of the deceptive ways the Crown Temple - Middle Templars - have taken control
of America since the beginning of our settlements.
Later, as President Washington’s U.S. Treasury Secretary, Hamilton alone laid
the foundation of the first Federal U.S. Central Bank, secured credit loans
through Crown banks in France and the Netherlands, and increased the power of
the Federal Government over the hoodwinked nation-states of the Union. Hamilton
had never made a secret of the fact that he admired the government and fiscal
policies of Great Britain.
Americans were fooled into believing that the legal Crown Colonies comprising
New England were independent nation states, but they never were nor are today.
They were and still are Colonies of the Crown Temple, through letters patent
and charters, who have no legal authority to be independent from the Rule and
Order of the Crown Temple. A legal State is a Crown Temple Colony.
Neither the American people nor the Queen of Britain own America. The Crown
Temple owns America through the deception of those who have sworn their
allegiance by oath to the Middle Templar Bar. The Crown Bankers and their
Middle Templar Attornies Rule America through unlawful contracts, unlawful
taxes, and contract documents of false equity through debt deceit, all strictly
enforced by their completely unlawful, but “legal”, Orders, Rules and Codes of
the Crown Temple Courts, our so-called “judiciary” in America. This is because
the Crown Temple holds the land titles and estate deeds to all of North
The biggest lie is what the Crown and its agents refer to as “the rule of law”.
In reality, it is not about law at all, but solely about the Crown Rule of all
nations. For example, just read what President Bush stated on November 13,
2001, regarding the “rule of law:”
“Our countries are embarked on a new relationship for the 21st century, founded
on a commitment to the values of democracy, the free market, and the rule of
law.” - Joint Statement by President George W. Bush and President Vladimir V.
Putin on 11/13/01, spoken from the White House, Washington D.C.
happened in 1776?
"Whoever owns the soil, owns all the way to the heavens and to the depths
of the earth." - Old Latin maxim and Roman _expression.
1776 is the year that will truly live in infamy for all Americans. It is the
year that the Crown Colonies became legal Crown States. The Declaration of
Independence was a legal, not lawful, document. It was signed on both sides by
representatives of the Crown Temple. Legally, it announced the status quo of
the Crown Colonies to that of the new legal name called “States” as direct
possessive estates of the Crown (see the definitions above to understand the
legal trickery that was done).
The American people were hoodwinked into thinking they were declaring lawful
independence from the Crown. Proof that the Colonies are still in Crown
possession is the use of the word “State” to signify a “legal estate of
possession.” Had this been a document of and by the people, both the
Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution would have been written
using the word “states”. By the use of “State,” the significance of a
government of estate possession was legally established. All of the North
American States are Crown Templar possessions through their legal document,
signed by their representation of both parties to the contract, known as the
Constitution of the United States of America.
All “Constitutional Rights” in America are simply those dictated by the Crown
Temple and enforced by the Middle Inn Templars (Bar Attorners) through their
franchise and corporate government entity, the federal United States
Government. When a “State Citizen” attempts to invoke his “constitutional”,
natural, or common law “rights” in Chancery (equity courts), he is told they
don’t apply. Why? Simply because a State citizen has no rights outside of the
Rule and Codes of Crown “law”. Only a state citizen has natural and common law
rights by the paramount authority of God’s Law.
The people who comprise the citizenry of a state are recognized only within
natural and common law as is already established by God’s Law. Only a State
Citizen can be a party to an action within a State Court. A common state
citizen cannot be recognized in that court because he doesn’t legally exist in
Crown Chancery Courts. In order to be recognized in their State Courts, the
common man must be converted to that of a corporate or legal entity (a legal
Now you know why they create such an entity using all capital letters within
Birth Certificates issued by the State. They convert the common lawful man of
God into a fictional legal entity subject to Administration by State Rules,
Orders and Codes (there is no “law” within any Rule or Code). Of course, Rules,
Codes, etc. do not apply to the lawful common man of the Lord of lords, so the
man with inherent Godly law and rights must be converted into a legal “Person”
of fictional “status” (another legal term) in order for their legal - but
completely unlawful – State Judiciary (Chancery Courts) to have authority over
him. Chancery Courts are tribunal courts where the decisions of “justice” are
decided by 3 “judges”. This is a direct result of the Crown Temple having
invoked their Rule and Code over all judicial courts.
“It is held to be a settled Rule, that our courts can not take notice of any
title to land not derived from the State or Colonial government, and duly
verified by patent.” -4 Johns. Rep. 163. Jackson v. Waters, 12 Johns. Rep. 365.
The Crown Temple was granted Letters Patent (see definition above) and Charters
(definition below) for all the land (Colonies) of New England by the King of
England, a sworn member of the Middle Temple (as the Queen is now). Since the
people were giving the patent/charter corporations and Colonial Governours such
a hard time, especially concerning Crown taxation, a scheme was devised to
allow the Americans to believe they were being granted “independence.”
Remember, the Crown Templars represented both parties to the 1776 Declaration
of Independence; and, as we are about to see, the latter 1787 U.S.
To have this “Declaration” recognized by international treaty law, and in order
to establish the new legal Crown entity of the incorporated United States,
Middle Templar King George III agreed to the Treaty of
Paris on September 3, 1783, “between the Crown of Great Britain and the
said United States”. The Crown of Great Britain legally was, then and now, the
Crown Temple. This formally gave international recognition to the corporate
“United States”, the new Crown Temple States (Colonies). Most important is to
know who the actual signatories to the Treaty of Paris were. Take particular
note to the abbreviation “Esqr.” following their names (see above definition
for ESQUIRE) as this legally signifies “Officers of the King’s Courts”, which
we now know were Templar Courts or Crown Courts. This is the same Crown Templar
Title given to Alexander Hamilton (see above).
The Crown was represented in signature by “David Hartley, Esqr.”, a Middle
Templar of the King’s Court. Representing the United States (a Crown franchise)
by signature was “John Adams, Esqr”, “Benjamin Franklin, Esqr.” and “John Jay,
Esqr.” The signatories for the “United States” were also Middle Templars of the
King’s Court through Bar Association membership. What is plainly written in
history proves, once again, that the Crown Temple was representing both parties
to the agreement. What a perfect and elaborate scam the people of North America
had pulled on them!
It becomes even more obvious when you read Article 5, which states in part,
“to provide for the Restitution of all Estates, Rights, and Properties which
have been confiscated, belonging to real British Subjects.”
The Crown Colonies were granted to “persons” and corporations of the Crown
Temple through Letters Patent and Charters, and the North American Colonial
land was owned by the Crown.
here’s a real catch-all in Article 4:
“It is agreed that creditors on either side shall meet with no lawful
impediment to the recovery of the full value in sterling money of all bona fide
debts heretofore contracted.”
Since the Crown and its Templars represented both the United States, as the
debtors, and the Crown, as the creditors, then they became the creditor of the
American people by owning all debts of the former Colonies, now called the
legal Crown States. This sounds too good to be true, but these are the facts.
The words SCAM and HOODWINKED can’t begin to describe what had taken place.
So then, what debts were owed to the Crown Temple and their banks as of 1883?
In the Contract Between the King and the Thirteen United States of
North America, signed at Versailles July 16, 1782, Article I states,
“It is agreed and certified that the sums advanced by His Majesty to the
Congress of the United States under the title of a loan, in the years 1778,
1779, 1780, 1781, and the present 1782, amount to the sum of eighteen million
of livres, money of France, according to the following twenty-one receipts of
the above-mentioned underwritten Minister of Congress, given in virtue of his
full powers, to wit…”
That amount equals about $18 million dollars, plus interest, that Hamilton’s
U.S. Central Bank owed the Crown through Crown Bank loans in France. This was
signed, on behalf of the United States, by an already familiar Middle Templar,
Benjamin Franklin, Esquire.
An additional $6 million dollars (six million livres) was loaned to the United
States at 5% interest by the same parties in a similar Contract signed on February 25, 1783. The Crown Bankers in
the Netherlands and France were calling in their debts for payment by future
generations of Americans.
Fiscal Agents of Mystery Babylon
Since its beginnings, the Temple Church at the City of London has been a Knight
Templar secret society. It was built and established by the same Temple Knights
who were given their Rule and Order by the Roman Pope. It’s very important to
know how the British Royal Crown was placed into the hands of the Knights
Templars, and how the Crown Templars became the fiscal and military agents for
the Pope of the Roman Church.
This all becomes very clear through the Concession
Of England To The Pope on May 15, 1213.charter was sworn in fealty by
England’s King John to Pope Innocent and the Roman Church. It was witnessed
before the Crown Templars, as King John stated upon sealing the same,
“I myself bearing witness in the house of the Knights Templars.”
Pay particular attention to the words being used that we have defined below,
especially charter, fealty, demur, and concession:
We wish it to be known to all of you, through this our charter, furnished with
our seal… not induced by force or compelled by fear, but of our own good and
spontaneous will and by the common counsel of our barons, do offer and freely
concede to God and His holy apostles Peter and Paul and to our mother the holy
Roman church, and to our lord pope Innocent and to his Catholic successors, the
whole kingdom of England and the whole kingdom Ireland, with all their rights
and appurtenances… we perform and swear fealty for them to him our aforesaid
lord pope Innocent, and his catholic successors and the Roman church… binding
our successors and our heirs by our wife forever, in similar manner to perform
fealty and show homage to him who shall be chief pontiff at that time, and to
the Roman church without demur. As a sign… we will and establish perpetual
obligation and concession… from the proper and especial revenues of our
aforesaid kingdoms… the Roman church shall receive yearly a thousand marks
sterling… saving to us and to our heirs our rights, liberties and regalia; all
of which things, as they have been described above, we wish to have perpetually
valid and firm; and we bind ourselves and our successors not to act counter to
them. And if we or any one of our successors shall presume to attempt this,
whoever he be, unless being duly warned he come to his kingdom, and this
senses, be shall lose his right to the kingdom, and this charter of our
obligation and concession shall always remain firm.
Most who have commented on this charter only emphasize the payments due the
Pope and the Roman Church. What should be emphasized is the fact that King John
broke the terms of this charter by signing the Magna Carta on June 15, 1215.
Remember; the penalty for breaking the 1213 agreement was the loss of the Crown
(right to the kingdom) to the Pope and his Roman Church. It says so quite
plainly. To formally and lawfully take the Crown from the royal monarchs of
England by an act of declaration, on August 24, 1215, Pope Innocent III
annulled the Magna Carta; later in the year, he placed an Interdict
(prohibition) on the entire British empire. From that time until today, the
English monarchy and the entire British Crown belonged to the Pope.
The following definitions are all taken from Webster’s 1828 Dictionary since
the meanings have not been perverted for nearly 200 years:
FEALTY, n. [L. fidelis.] Fidelity to a lord; faithful adherence of a
tenant or vassal to the superior of whom he holds his lands; loyalty. Under the
feudal system of tenures, every vassal or tenant was bound to be true and faithful
to his lord, and to defend him against all his enemies. This obligation was
called his fidelity or fealty, and an oath of fealty was required to be taken
by all tenants to their landlords. The tenant was called a liege man; the land,
a liege fee; and the superior, liege lord.
FEE, n. [In English, is loan. This word, fee, inland, or an estate in
trust, originated among the descendants of the northern conquerors of Italy,
but it originated in the south of Europe. See Feud.] Primarily, a loan of land,
an estate in trust, granted by a prince or lord, to be held by the grantee on
condition of personal service, or other condition; and if the grantee or tenant
failed to perform the conditions, the land reverted to the lord or donor,
called the landlord, or lend-lord, the lord of the loan. A fee then is any land
or tenement held of a superior on certain conditions. It is synonymous with
fief and feud. In the United States, an estate in fee or fee simple is what is
called in English law an allodial estate, an estate held by a person in his own
right, and descendible to the heirs in general.
FEUD, n. [L. fides; Eng. loan.] A fief; a fee; a right to lands or
hereditaments held in trust, or on the terms of performing certain conditions;
the right which a vassal or tenant has to the lands or other immovable thing of
his lord, to use the same and take the profits thereof hereditarily, rendering
to his superior such duties and services as belong to military tenure, &c.,
the property of the soil always remaining in the lord or superior.
By swearing to the 1213 Charter in fealty, King John declared that the
British-English Crown and its possessions at that time, including all future
possessions, estates, trusts, charters, letters patent, and land, were forever
bound to the Pope and the Roman Church, the landlord. Some five hundred years
later, the New England Colonies in America became a part of the Crown as a
possession and trust named the “United States.”
ATTORNING, ppr. Acknowledging a new lord, or transferring homage and
fealty to the purchaser of an estate.
Bar Attorneys have been attorning ever since they were founded at the Temple
Church, by acknowledging that the Crown and he who holds the Crown is the new
lord of the land.
CHARTER, n. 1. A written instrument, executed with usual forms, given as
evidence of a grant, contract, or whatever is done between man and man. In its
more usual sense, it is the instrument of a grant conferring powers, rights and
privileges, either from a king or other sovereign power, or from a private
person, as a charter of exemption, that no person shall be empanelled on a
jury, a charter of pardon, &c. The charters under which most of the
colonies in America were settled, were given by the king of England, and
incorporated certain persons, with powers to hold the lands granted, to
establish a government, and make laws for their own regulation. These were
By agreeing to the Magna Carta, King John had broken the agreement terms of his
fealty with Rome and the Pope.
The Pope and his Roman Church control the Crown Temple because his Knights
established it under his Orders. He who controls the gold controls the world.
Crown Temple Today
The workings of the Crown Temple in this day and age is moreso obvious, yet
somewhat hidden. The Crown Templars have many names and many symbols to signify
their private and unholy Temple. Take a close look at the (alleged) one dollar
$1 private Federal Reserve System (a Crown banking franchise) Debt Note.
Notice in the base of the pyramid the Roman date MDCCLXXVI which is written in
Roman numerals for the year 1776. The words ANNUIT COEPTIS NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM
are Roman Latin for ANNOUNCING THE BIRTH OF THE NEW ORDER OF THE WORLD. Go back
to the definitions above and pay particular attention to the words CAPITOL,
CROWN and TEMPLE. 1776 signifies the birth of the New World Order under the
Crown Temple. That’s when their American Crown Colonies became the chartered
government called the United States, thanks to the Declaration of Independence.
Since that date, the United Nations (another legal Crown Temple by charter)
rose up and refers to every nation as a State member.
Wizard of Oz = the Crown Temple
This is not a mere child’s story written by L. Frank Baum. What symbol does
“Oz” stand for? Ounces.Gold What is the yellow brick road? Bricks or ingot bars
The character known as the Straw Man represents that fictitious ALL CAPS legal
fiction - a PERSON - the Federal U.S. Government created with the same spelling
as your Christian birth name. Remember what the Straw Man wanted from the
Wizard of Oz? A brain! No legal fiction has a brain because they have no breath
of life! What did he get in place of a brain? A Certificate. A Birth
Certificate for a new legal creation. He was proud of his new legal status,
plus all the other legalisms he was granted. Now he becomes the true epitome of
the brainless sack of straw who was given a Certificate in place of a brain of
What about the Tin Man? Does Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) mean anything
to you? The poor TIN Man just stood there mindlessly doing his work until his
body literally froze up and stopped functioning. He worked himself to death
because he had no heart nor soul. He’s the heartless and emotionless creature
robotically carrying out his daily task as if he was already dead. He’s the ox
pulling the plow and the mule toiling under the yoke. His masters keep him cold
on the outside and heartless on the inside in order to control any emotions or
heart he may get a hold of.
The pitiful Cowardly Lion was always too frightened to stand up for himself. Of
course, he was a bully and a big mouth when it came to picking on those smaller
than he was. They act as if they have great courage, but they really have none
at all. All roar with no teeth of authority to back them up. When push came to
shove, the Cowardly Lion always buckled under and whimpered when anyone of any
size or stature challenged him. He wanted courage from the Grand Wizard, so he
was awarded a medal of “official” recognition. Now, regardless of how much of a
coward he still was, his official status made him a bully with officially
recognized authority. He’s just like the Attorneys who hide behind the Middle
Courts of the Temple Bar.
What about the trip through the field of poppies? They weren’t real people, so
drugs had no effect on them. The Wizard of Oz was written at the turn of the
century, so how could the author have known America was going to be drugged?
The Crown has been playing the drug cartel game for centuries. Just look up the
history of Hong Kong and the Opium Wars. The Crown already had valuable
experience conquering all of China with drugs, so why not the rest of the
Who finally exposed the Wizard for what he really was? Toto, the ugly (or cute,
depending on your perspective) and somewhat annoying little dog. Toto means “in
total, all together; Latin in toto.” Notice how Toto was not scared of the
Great Wizard’s theatrics, yet he was so small in size compared to the Wizard,
no-one seemed to notice him. The smoke, flames and hologram images were
designed to frighten people into doing as the Great Wizard of Oz commanded.
Toto simply went over, looked behind the curtain – the court - (see the
definition for curtain above), saw it was a scam, and started barking until
others paid attention to him and came to see what all the barking was
about.Just an ordinary person controlling the levers that created the illusions
of the Great Wizard’s power and authority. The veil hiding the corporate legal
fiction and its false courts was removed. The Wizard’s game was up. It’s too
bad that people don’t realize how loud a bark from a little dog is. How about
your bark? Do you just remain silent and wait to be given whatever food and
recognition, if any, your legal master gives you?
Let’s not forget those pesky flying monkeys. What a perfect mythical creature
to symbolize the Bar Association Attorners who attack and control all the
little people for the Great Crown Wizard, the powerful and grand Bankers of Oz
What is it going to take to expose the Wizard and tear down the court veil for
what they really are? Each of us needs only a brain, a heart and soul, and
courage. Then, and most importantly, we all need to learn how to work together.
Only “in toto,” working together as one Body of the King of Kings, can we ever
be free or have the freedom given under God’s Law.
There is no mystery behind the current abomination of Babylon for those who discern
And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE
MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.
God has reserved His judgment for the great idolatress, Rome, the chief seat of
all idolatry, that rules over many nations with whom the kings have committed
to the worship of her idols (see Revelation 17:1-4). The Pope and His purported
Church; sitting on the Temple throne at the Vatican; ruling the nations of the
earth through the Crown Temple of ungodly deities are the Rule and Order of
Babylon; the Crown of godlessness and the Code of commerce.
One may call the Rule of the world today by many names: The New World Order (a
Bush family favourite), the Third Way (spoken by Tony Blair and Bill Clinton),
the Illuminati, Triad, Triangle, Trinity, Masonry, the United Nations, the EU,
the US, or many dozens of other names. However, they all point to one origin
and one beginning. We have traced this in history to the Crown Temple, the
Temple Church circa 1200. Because the Pope created the Order of the Temple
Knights (the Grand Wizards of deception) and established their mighty Temple
Church in the sovereign City of London, it is the Pope and his Roman Capitols
who control the world.
“And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold
and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of
abominations and filthiness of her fornication”
This verse appears to be an accurate description of the Pope and His Bishops
for the past 1,700 years. The idolatries of commerce in the world: all the gold
and silver; the iron and soft metals; the money and coins and riches of the
world: All of these are under the control of the Crown Temple; the Roman King
and his false Church; the throne of Babylon; attended to by his Templar
Knights, the Wizards of abomination and idolatry.
“The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman [mother of harlots]
sitteth” - Revelation 17:9
The only mention of “seven mountains” within our present-day Bible is at
Revelation 17:9, so it’s no wonder this has been a mystery to the current Body
of Christ. The 1611 King James (who was a Crown Templar) Bible is not the
entire canon of the early church (“church” in Latin ecclesia; in Greek
ekklesia). This in itself is no mystery as history records the existence and
destruction of these early church writings; just as history has now proven
their genuine authenticity with the appearance of the Dead Sea Scrolls and the
coptic library at Nag Hagmadi in Egypt, among many other recent Greek language
discoveries within the past 100 years.
The current Holy Bible quotes the Book of Enoch numerous times:
By faith Enoch was taken away so that he did not see death, "and was not
found, because God had taken him"; for before he was taken he had this
testimony, that he pleased God.
- Hebrews 11:5
Now Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied about these men also, saying, "Behold, the Lord comes with ten thousands of His saints, to
execute judgment on all, to convict all who are ungodly among them of all their
ungodly deeds which they have committed in an ungodly way, and of all the harsh
things which ungodly sinners have spoken against Him."
- Jude 1:14-15
The Book of Enoch was considered scripture by most early Christians. The
earliest literature of the so-called "Church Fathers" is filled with
references to this mysterious book. The second century Epistle of Barnabus
makes much use of the Book of Enoch. Second and Third Century "Church
Fathers," such as Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Origin and Clement of
Alexandria, all make use of the Book of Enoch "Holy Scripture". The
Ethiopic Church included the Book of Enoch to its official canon. It was widely
known and read the first three centuries after Christ. However, this and many
other books became discredited after the Roman Council of Laodicea. Being under
ban of the Roman Papal authorities, afterwards they gradually passed out of
At about the time of the Protestant Reformation, there was a renewed interest
in the Book of Enoch, which had long since been lost to the modern world. By
the late 1400's, rumors began to spread that a copy of the long lost Book of
Enoch might still exist. During this time, many books arose claiming to be the
lost book but were later found to be forgeries.
The return of the Book of Enoch to the modern western world is credited to the
famous explorer James Bruce, who in 1773 returned from six years in Abyssinia
with three Ethiopic copies of the lost book. In 1821, Richard Laurence
published the first English translation. The now famous R.H. Charles edition
was first published by Oxford Press in 1912. In the following years, several
portions of the Greek text also surfaced. Then, with the discovery of cave
number four of the Dead Sea Scrolls, seven fragmentary copies of the Aramaic
text were discovered.
Within the Book of Enoch is revealed one of the mysteries of Babylon
concerning the seven mountains she sits upon (underlining has been added):
[CHAPTER 52] 2 There mine eyes saw all the secret things of heaven that shall
be; a mountain of iron, a mountain of copper, a mountain of silver, a mountain
of gold, a mountain of soft metal, and a mountain of lead.
6 These  mountains which thine eyes have seen: The mountain of iron, the
mountain of copper, the mountain of silver, the mountain of gold, the mountain
of soft metal, and the mountain of lead. All these shall be in the presence of
the Elect One as wax: Before the fire, like the water which streams down from
above upon those mountains, and they shall become powerless before his feet. 7
It shall come to pass in those days that none shall be saved, either by gold or
by silver, and none be able to escape. 8 There shall be no iron for war, nor
shall one clothe oneself with a breastplate. Bronze shall be of no service, tin
shall be of no service and shall not be esteemed, and lead shall not be
desired. 9 All these things shall be denied and destroyed from the surface of
the earth when the Elect One shall appear before the face of the Lord of
[CHAPTER 24] 3 The seventh mountain was in the midst of these, and it excelled
them in height, resembling the seat of a throne; and fragrant trees encircled
[CHAPTER 25] 3 And he answered saying: ‘This high mountain which thou hast
seen, whose summit is like the throne of God, is His throne, where the Holy
Great One, the Lord of Glory, the Eternal King, will sit, when He shall come
down to visit the earth with goodness. 4 As for this fragrant tree, no mortal
is permitted to touch it until the great judgement when He shall take vengeance
on all and bring (everything) to its consummation for ever. 5 It shall then be
given to the righteous and Holy. Its fruit shall be for food to the elect: It
shall be transplanted to the Holy place, to the temple of the Lord, the Eternal
King. 6 Then shall they rejoice with joy and be glad, and into the Holy place
shall they enter; its fragrance shall be in their bones and they shall live a
long life on earth, such as thy fathers lived: In their days shall no sorrow,
or plague, or torment, or calamity touch them.’
The present wealth and power of all the world’s gold, silver, tin, bronze,
pearls, diamonds, gemstones, iron, and copper belonging the Babylon whore, and
held in the treasuries of her Crown Templar banks and deep stony vaults, will
not be able to save them at the time of the Lord’s judgment.
But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom
of heaven against men: for ye neither go in [yourselves], neither suffer ye
them that are entering to go in.
– Matthew 23:13
we go from here?
Now that their false Temple has been exposed, how does this apply to the
Kingdom of Heaven? To reach the end, you must know the beginning. For
everything ordained of God, there is an imitation ordained of evil that looks
like the genuine thing. There is the knowledge of good and the knowledge of
evil. The problem is, most believe they have the knowledge of God when what
they really have is knowledge of world deceptions operating as gods. The only
way to discern and begin to understand the Kingdom of Heaven is to seek the
Knowledge that comes only from God, not the knowledge of men who take their
legal claim as earthly rulers and gods.
The false Crown Temple and its Grand Wizard Knights have led the world to
believe that they are of the Lord God and hold the knowledge and keys to His
Kingdom. What they hold within their Temples are the opposite. They claim to be
the “Holy Church,” but which holy church? The real one or the false one? Are
the Pope and his Roman Church the Temple of God, or is this the unholy Temple
of Babylon sitting upon the seven mountains?
They use the same words, but alter them to show the true meaning they have
applied: The State is not a state; a Certificate is not a certification. The
Roman Church is not the church (ekklesia). There is the Crown of the Lord; and
a Crown of that which is not of the Lord. All imitations appear to be the
genuine article, but they are fakes. Those who are truly seeking the genuine
Kingdom of God must allow the Lord to show them the discernment between the
genuine and the imitation. Without this discernment by the Holy Spirit, all
will remain fooled by the illusions of false deity emanating from the unholy
spirits of the Wizards.
Neither shall they say, Lo here! Or, lo there! For behold, the kingdom of God
is within you.
- Luke 17:21
Jesus said, "If your leaders say to you, 'Look,
the (Father's) kingdom is in the sky,' then the birds of the sky will precede
you. If they say to you, 'It is in the sea,' then the fish will precede you.
Rather, the FATHER'S kingdom is within you and it is outside you."
– Gospel of Thomas 3
Don’t you know that you are the temple of God,
and that the Spirit of God lives in you?
– 1 Corinthians 3:16
Jesus said, "Know what is in front of
your face, and what is hidden from you will be disclosed to you. For there is
nothing hidden that will not be revealed. [And there is nothing buried that
will not be raised."]
– Gospel of Thomas 5
VATICAN CONNECTION TO ENGLAND, A CONTINUATION OF ROMAN CONQUEST
Association History & Who Owns the U.S.
See The Official
International Knights Templar Website
ACCREDITED REGISTRY" from Larry Becraft
Freedom produced by WORLD
Copyright © 2002. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
page image by Terri Williams
"Frameworks of Orientation": Creating
Enemies for the Masses
The Inquisitions of the Middle Ages
Inquisitions of the Middle Ages were, and the Inquisitions of today still are,
to prevent democratic choice. The Roman emperors Constantine and Theodosius I,
in the early 4th-Century AD, stopped the persecution of the Christian church
and, along with Justinian I, essentially made the Catholic Church the state
religion. Just as the wealth of today migrates toward tax shelters, over the
next 700 years aristocracy migrated towards positions of power in the higher
offices of the church—those of bishops, cardinals, and pope. Where the church
and its people were once one, the church hierarchy (First Estate) and
aristocracy (Second Estate) were now one; there was now a distinct division
between the church leaders and the common people. From their new power base
running the church, the combined First and Second Estates sold indulgencies and
salvations. The common people were terrified of Purgatory and the last bit of
wealth could be extracted from those who hoped to be saved and go straight to
heaven. Edward Burman, in The
Inquisition , from which this chronology is taken, explains that
with the returning Crusaders in the late 11th and early 12th centuries came
various unorthodox Christian beliefs filtering into Europe from Jerusalem.
of these beliefs permitted each person to find his or her own way to heaven and
(primarily the well-organized and rapidly expanding Cathars and Waldensians)
openly frowned on a wealthy, licentious church. Others were drawing away church
members by competing claims of miraculous cures. All powerbrokers fear the
expansion of the political powers of others while their own power shrinks.
was the Church's fear of these competing beliefs. The Albigensian Crusade
(1209-1229) was organized by Pope Innocent III to destroy the Cathars of southern
France with their threatening doctrines and parallel organization of dioceses
headed by bishops. This was only the largest of various efforts to suppress
heresies since the middle of the 10th-Century. As with all crusades (the
crusade of the Cold War is a good example), this required a massive "framework of orientation";
a strategy-of-tension portraying
the Cathars as a dangerous enemy, in this case as infidels and heretics, to
justify their slaughter and the theft of their wealth.
burning of heretics at the stake for 200 years coalesced between 1123 and 1206
into the formal Inquisition. In 1206 and 1210 Pope Innocent III founded the
Franciscan and Dominican Mendicant Orders to preach against heresy; and in 1215
the Latern Council was held which listed “clause by clause” heretical
interpretations of the faith, the removal from office of heretics, confiscation
of their property, excommunication, and their referral to the feudal lords for
the Cathars fleeing to other sections of Europe to escape certain death from
zealous inquisitors and secular lords, between 1227 and 1252 Pope Gregory IX
and Pope Innocent IV issued several bulls that further encoded and formalized
the form of the Inquisition.
Inquisition was ready to start work on a grand scale shortly after the
mid-point of the thirteenth Century” and, as the Christian sects went
underground, Popes Alexander IX, Urban IV, Clement IV, and Boniface VIII issued
bulls to maintain that momentum and root out the last vestiges of threat to
and Dominican priests organized to lead heretics back to the fold evolved into
a few zealous priests becoming inquisitors and torturers. They condemned
hundreds of thousands of heretics to burn at the stake over a period of 700
years, the majority being Cathars, Waldensians, Jews, and Muslims. As those
religious competitors disappeared, Freemasons, alleged witches, midwives, and
personal enemies were targeted.
the fear of losing power acquired over a period of a thousand years can
satisfactorily explain such violent reactions.”250
Because they did not believe in buying one's way out of salvation and would
draw people from the state church, the Cathars were headed for extinction.
They, the Waldensians, and smaller sects in most of Europe were suppressed by
1270 but Jews and Muslims survived as a political force on an ever-shrinking
part of the Iberian Peninsula.
are taught how Roman pagans tortured Christians. But in reality the alliance
between the state and the Church extinguished both paganism and competing
Christian sects through extreme violence and “the number of Christians executed
by other Christians in a single province during the reign of Charles V [alone]
far exceeded that of all the martyrs who perished at the hands of the pagans
throughout the Roman Empire in the space of three centuries.”251
The Spanish Inquisition
the inquisitorial pattern well established, starting in 1478 the Christian
secular powers of Spain proceeded to eradicate Jews and Muslims from their
territory. The choice was between leaving Spain, converting to Christianity, or
being burnt at the stake. It is only because the power of the Spanish empire
was a threat to British and other empires that the world knows so much about
the Spanish Inquisition and so little about the French, Italian, and British
Inquisitions. Although all were equally violent, the history of each culture
suppressed the exposure of their inquisitorial violence and emphasized the
violence in their archenemy Spain. This is the “creation of enemies” through a strategy-of-tension to
protect a power-structure as it has functioned throughout history.
The Inquisitorial Suppression of the Templars
Knights Templar were industrious and faithful servants of Christianity. Their
history began in 1119 when nine knights formed an association to protect
pilgrims in the Holy Land. They fought so valiantly that
in abundance flowed in on the Order, large possessions were bestowed on it in
all countries of the west.... By the Bull, Omne
datum optimum , granted by Pope Alexander III in 1162, the Order of
the Templars acquired great importance, and from this time forth, it may be
regarded as totally independent, acknowledging no authority but that ... of the
Templars fought many battles for Christianity, and by 1302 they had spread over
much of Europe and were enormously wealthy and powerful. Much of the land owned
by the Templars had been given to their forebears by the grateful ancestors of
local aristocracy (in trade for the slaughter of non-Christian or heretical
Christian populations) and by a Church whose successors resented and feared the
power of this great order. Local bishops and clergy made many complaints to the
pope about the Templars' refusal to recognize local religious authority.
a French pope was consecrated in 1305, he rewarded King Philip IV of France and
other nobles by supporting an intrigue against the respected Templars. The
French secret service established a social-control-paradigm
) to protect the power-structure as they destroyed the Templars and
stole their wealth. They spread vicious rumors and
the night of the 13th of October, , all the Templars in the French dominions
were simultaneously arrested.... They were accused of worshipping an idol
covered with an old skin, embalmed, having the appearance of a piece of
polished oil-cloth. “In this idol,” we are assured, “there were two carbuncles
for eyes, bright as the brightness of heaven, and it is certain that all hope
of the Templars was placed in it: it was their sovereign god, and they trusted
in it with all their heart.” They are accused of burning the bodies of the
deceased brethren, and making the ashes into a powder, which they administered
to the younger brethren in their food and drink, to make them hold fast their
faith and idolatry; of cooking and roasting infants, and anointing their idols
with the fat; of celebrating hidden rites and mysteries, to which the young and
tender virgins were introduced, and of a variety of abominations too absurd and
horrible to be named.253
all inquisition charges, the fabrications of this social-control-paradigm (system of beliefs
or "framework of
orientation") could not be defended against and confessions
were obtained by torture. King Philip then sent the findings to other European
countries. These preposterous accusations were at first rejected, but by 1314
the Templars were totally discredited and destroyed; over 2,000 of them confessed
under torture and were quartered or burned at the stake. In only nine years the
Templars, who had been perceived for centuries as elite warriors and builders
of the Christian world, and who commanded both large resources and respect,
were labeled enemies and cast into oblivion. The First and Second Estates had
acted together to reclaim their wealth and power.254
Winding Down the Inquisitions of the Middle Ages
the Inquisition wound down in Europe in the 18th-Century (except in Spain), its
dying flame, now picked up by Protestant evangelists, reached America in the
form of the Salem witch trials. Small inquisitorial flames in Peru and Columbia
died out in the 17th-Century but in Spain and Mexico it was a primary political
tool well into the 19th-Century.
under a different name (changed twice, in 1908 and 1965), the Inquisition still
exists as “The Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith," the
conservative political arm which suppresses liberal elements within the Church.255
world will never know the true number slaughtered. Some authors claim reliable
estimates of between 200,000 and 1-million burned at the stake in the
witchcraft craze of the 16th and 17th centuries alone. Others claim 500,000
burned at the stake over a period of 400 years before the witchcraft craze even
was a far greater number killed in the sweeps of military forces organized
specifically to slaughter entire communities of Cathars, Waldensians, Jews, and
Muslims. And Templar and Hospitaler knights gained much of their land through
local Christian feudal lords giving them free rein to slaughter heretical
populations and sharing with them the spoils.
when one includes those killed other than by burning at the stake—which is by
far the greater number—deaths at the hands of inquisitors to increase the power
of the already powerful throughout the full 700 year inquisition history is
The Inquisitorial Suppression of the Illuminati
1776 Professor Adam Weishaupt of the University of Ingolstadt in Bavaria
(Germany) established the Bavarian Illuminati (“enlightened ones”), a secret
group to expand the rights of the people. Thirteen years later, the French
Revolution's promise of more extensive rights created even greater fear in the
First and Second Estates.
Third Estate, bourgeoisie with the support of the common people, now ruled
France. The potential for full rights for everybody could have become
contagious. The Illuminati supported those increased rights. In a replay of
earlier inquisitions, managers of the religious state immediately asserted
their control by frightening the population into a witch hunt. A "framework of orientation"
of an imminent enemy was put into place. The war cry went out that in effect
said, “Look out for the Illuminati! Look out for the Illuminati! They want to
take over your country! Your church! The world!”256 Note
that no one today will dispute that it was the king, aristocracy, and church
(those who created those strategies-of-tension
) that then controlled the so-called civilized world.
the Illuminati are active today and a threat to freedom is a fiction kept alive
by the far right wing, whose politics are too extreme even for most of those
who do hold the reins of power. It was the ruling powers who created these social-control paradigms to
control the masses to protect their wealth and power. It is ironic to note that
when people without sufficient education—or of radical bend— dig up those old
writings about the Illuminati (the "framework
of orientation" at that time), they point to the current
organizations of the powerful (such as the Trilateralists) as being the
Illuminati attempting to rule the world. Poetic justice!
the forward march of history could not be stopped. The intense efforts of the
Church and aristocracy to overthrow the French Revolution resulted in Napoleon
Bonaparte taking the reins of power in France. Through the conquest of many of
the nations which had conspired to overthrow the French Revolution and were conspiring
to overthrow this latest upstart, Napoleon spread throughout Europe many of the
rights declared for all men by that revolution. Known as the Napoleonic Codes,
“they are the basis for the law of over thirty nations today.”257
twin threats of loss of trading rights in Europe (Napoleon's Continental
System) and the threat of replacing aristocratic privilege with rights for all
people led to a “Holy Alliance” (more often called a “Monarchical Alliance” but
the church was always a crucial ally) between European monarchies and the
church to reclaim their aristocratic rights.
Napoleon freed most of Europe, he was ultimately defeated at Waterloo in 1815.
Aristocracy and European monarchies immediately convened the Congress of Vienna
to abrogate the newly gained rights of the masses. However, “Napoleon's omelet
couldn't be unscrambled.... It was a force destined to destroy the dynastic
teaches of Napoleon's desire to be a world dictator, when he was really
destroying the power of the First and Second Estates who did rule the world.
Because Napoleon was such a threat to the powerful, the secret services and
state departments of the European monarchies guided the writing and publication
of books depicting Napoleon as a megalomaniac and tyrannical dictator. These
concepts saturated the literature of the time and still saturate the literature
of today. In a replay of the Illuminati nonsense, once Napoleon was demonized
as an enemy of the people, the masses remained, and still are, unaware that
Napoleon really stood for reclaiming their rights.
Czarist Secret Police Demonize the Jews
example of a strategy-of-tension
(a "framework of
orientation") to justify assault on a specific people to
destroy their power and steal their wealth was The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion .
The Czarist (Russian) secret police created this alleged Jewish/Zionist master
plan for world domination out of thin air in 1903 to condition the population
for pogroms (government-sponsored riots) against the created enemy, the Jews.
and French translations appeared in 1920, but in 1921 a correspondent for the Times , Philip Graves,
proved they were forgeries. With the cooperation of a Russian refugee who had
helped create the deception, it was shown that the forgers “plagiarized
paraphrases from a satire on Napoleon.”259 That
satire was no doubt a previous creation intended, as explained above, to
demonize Napoleon because his egalitarian concepts of justice were a threat to
the privileged groups.
the fraud of the Protocols
of Zion is well known, there are many instances of such hoaxes that
are recorded in history and accepted as fact. Those tens of thousands of
CIA-created fraudulent articles and thousands of fraudulent books put out by
compliant professors and reporters addressed above are good examples. As
intelligence services of all imperial centers do this, one society will have
its created version of history and another society a different history
favorable to its desired view of the world. The holocaust of WWII was just the
climactic finale of over 1,000 years of hate rhetoric against the Jews,
preached from the pulpit, supposedly for killing Jesus. Just as the power of
right-wing extremists in U.S. society ebb and flow, the power of church
right-wing extremists ebb and flow.
it was once common to persecute the Jews openly, the horrors of the holocaust
made it no longer acceptable. All who would advocate such a thing are now
outside the permitted parameters of political or religious debate. Today most
Christians are supportive of the rights of Jewish people. This stems from the
positive statements of church leaders, as opposed to the previous violent
rhetoric of the right-wing minority creating tensions of an imminent enemy so
as to gain followers for their agenda.
Litvinoff, in his masterly work on the 2,000 years of Jewish persecution, The Burning Bush ,
points out that the persecutors and supporters of the Jews have periodically
changed sides.260 Each of these changes
required the targeted population to be programmed either as an enemy or a friend.
That change is the necessary paradigm shift to gain a following that telegraphs
the intentions of the managers-of-state
The World starts Breaking Free from Imperial Centers
gripped the powerful when Russia broke free in the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution.
The Third Estate, the bourgeoisie, with the support of the common people, had
revolted and taken the reins of power from the 1st and 2nd Estates. As WWI
ground to a halt, Communist revolutionaries were taking over railroads and
factories as Germany collapsed. The disillusioned German navy and much of the
army were hoisting the red flag. Only an alliance between Social Democrats and
the socialist wing of labor gave private armies called “free corps” enough time
to wrestle those railroads, factories, and disaffected military from the
That Social Democrat/Socialist alliance was broken when the old powerbrokers
reclaimed control through the installation of Hitler and his Fascists.
the old imperial nations knew how close the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia came
to spilling over into Poland, Austria, Germany, and even Italy. They knew that,
if those major nations were lost, the rest of Europe was sure to follow. A
firewall to prevent that threatening philosophy from sweeping them from power
had to be built. The scourge of Bolshevism (Communism) was created as the
primary "framework of
orientation". Copied from the old Illuminati and Zionist
scare, the message, increasing the level of tension so the masses could be
controlled, was the same, “Communism! Communism! They want to take over your
country! Your church! The world!” Under that call to arms between the two world
wars, most of the governments of Europe were turned over to Fascists.
the United States, in 1920, the suppression of American political rights took
the form of the Palmer Raids, in which thousands, mostly labor unionists
suspected of Soviet sympathies, were arrested in the middle of the night.
Hundreds were deported, and hundreds more were sent to prison.262 Again
take note that most of the world was still under the control of the managers-of-state of
those countries sounding the warning. The country that had broken away from
capitalism's control was, by comparison, extremely weak.
the managers-of-state really
feared was the failure of the 14-nation attempt to overthrow the Bolshevik
Revolution, the governing of that country by the common people, and how close
Germany, Italy, and a few other countries had come to being lost to the same
revolutionary forces. Lest taking democracy seriously would spread and destroy
the power-structure of the imperial nations operating under a limited democracy
at best, the masses of these “free” countries had to be inoculated against the
ideology of that revolution through creation of the Bolshevik (Communist)
during the crisis of the Great Depression that soon followed, the inoculation
was quickly wearing off. The managers-of-state
of European countries knew that the leaders of labor would govern
if honest elections were permitted, so they turned the governments over to
all over Europe acted to avoid a ballot-box revolution such as
occurred in Spain. The Fascist takeovers of the governments of Europe were a
sham to suppress the democratic voice of the people:
was eventually put in power by the feudalist clique around President
Hindenburg, just as Mussolini and Primo de Rivera were ushered into office by
their respective sovereigns.... In no case was an actual revolution against
constituted authority launched; fascist tactics were those of a sham rebellion
arranged with the tacit approval of the authorities who pretended to have been
overwhelmed by force.263
how the Fascists were put in power by back-room political deals, specifically
for the protection of power and wealth and to avoid democratic solutions, yet
are recorded in history as only Fascism and that only in Germany and Italy;
ignoring all other such states. The preceding quotation was from economic
historian Karl Polanyi, who recognized that desperate powerbrokers used the
violence of Fascism to suppress democracy.
was a German intelligence officer throughout Germany's post-WWI crisis and it is
highly likely his rise to power was orchestrated by German intelligence
specifically to protect a power-structure that was crumbling.264 That these
realities can be found only by in-depth reading, or by chance, is because much
of history has been written, and is being written, to protect a
famed march of the Black Shirts that supposedly put Mussolini in power took
place three days after Italy
had been effectively handed over to Fascist control. Germany's famous Reichstag
fire was several months after
Hitler had been given power in a secret January meeting of German
powerbrokers.265 Those acts
were a part of that "framework
of orientation" depicting the opposition as terrorists and
enemies and thus weakening them politically before the national election that
legitimized Hitler's rule.
in Spain were free elections permitted and, to the horror of the captains of
capitalism, labor won the right to govern. The connection between the
powerbrokers, Fascism, and the fear of ballot-box revolutions was evident when
troops from Germany and Italy (with unspoken but real support from America,
Britain, and France) supported the dictator Franco, and, in a bloody foreshadow
of WWII, overthrew that election.aj
real target of the back-room political deal in Germany was labor that was
poised to take over the reins of the German government by the vote. When Hitler
seized power in 1933, police were ordered to shoot key labor leaders on sight
and within a year 100,000 politically aware persons were in prison.266
Witness the comments of a member of Hitler's cabinet, Colonel Walther von
Reichenau. His analysis of the crisis in Germany could be used almost without
changing a word to describe labor's position in America since 1980, in the
collapsed economies on the periphery of empire since 1997, and in the U.S.
after the Patriot Act:
trade unions have been smashed, the communists driven into a corner and
provisionally neutralized, the Reichstag has surrendered its rights with the
Enabling Law. The workers are keeping their heads down and, after the previous
slump, their wage packets will be more important to them than any politics.267
there had previously been much rhetoric against, and individual persecution of,
the Jews within Germany, organized attacks against them did not start until November
9, 1938—- Kristallnacht (The
Night of Broken Glass).268
The onslaught against the Jews by Fascists was undertaken to repay the
super-secret Thule Society (surely now rebuilding in Europe and roughly similar
to America's Aryan Nations) for their early financial support of Hitler. The
Thule Society organized Hitler's German Workers' Party and supported it
financially. Their symbol was the swastika, and this became the symbol of
German Fascism. It is reasonable to assume that Hitler put these fanatics into
positions of power because they were the power behind him.269
the original targets of the Inquisition (Christian Cathars and Waldensians)
were eliminated, the inquisitors turned towards searching for witches and
satanic cults to justify their existence and maintain their power.270
Those first accused of practicing the “black arts” and burned at the stake were
rather defenseless people. However, as the hysteria continued, the accusatory
finger pointed higher and higher and eventually pointed towards those in power.
When these powerful became the target, the hysteria died down. After a respite,
the witch hunts would start again.
same pattern was observed when McCarthy's “witch-hunts” started destroying
those in power, the powerful turned and destroyed him and the hysteria died
down. Whenever the personal risk to leaders is high, they are motivated to
defend themselves. This demonstrates that the process can be controlled and the
public protected if the leaders ever decide they wish to do so.
The wrongly titled
Spanish Civil War is a textbook study how the battle cry of communism has been
used to motivate populations to support the overthrow of some of the world's
most democratic elections. The competing parties in Spain's election “consisted
of two Republican parties with 126 representatives in the Cortez, ninety-nine
socialists, thirty-five Catalan Separatists, and just seventeen Communists”
(George Seldes, “The Roman Church and Franco,” The Human Quest, March-April,
1994, pp. 16-18). George Seldes, Even the Gods can't Change History (Secaucus,
N.J: Lyle Stuart, Inc., 1976), part II, Chapter 3). Likewise, due to the CIA's
Mighty Wurlitzer propaganda tagging them as communist, Americans were unaware
that the Communist Party was one of the smallest of 14 political parties in the
1984 Nicaraguan election that legitimized the Sandinista government. Back to text
250. NotesEdward Burman, The Inquisition: Hammer of Heresy
(New York: Dorset Press, 1992), p. 39.Back to text
251. Michael Parenti, History as Mystery (San Francisco,
City Lights Books, 1999), p. 38.Back to text
252. James Burnes, The Knights Templar (London: Paybe and
Foss, 1840), pp. 12-14. See also Stephen Howarth's Knights Templar (New York:
Dorset Press, 1982). Back
253. Charles G. Addison, The Knights Templar (London:
Longman, Brown, Green, and Longman, 1842), pp. 194-203, especially p. 203. See
also Burman, Inquisition, pp. 95-99. Back to text
254. Burman, Inquisition, pp. 95-99. Back to text
255. Ibid, pp. 213-14. Back to text
256. David Caute, The Great Fear (New York: Simon and
Schuster, 1978), pp. 18-19; Richard Hofstadter, The Paranoid Style in American
Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979), pp. 10-11; Arkon Daraul,
A History of Secret Societies (Secaucus, NJ: Citadel Press, 1961); James and
Suzanne Pool, Who Financed Hitler? (New York: Dial Press, 1978); Barnet
Litvinoff, The Burning Bush (New York: E.P. Dutton, 1988); Heiko Oberman, The
Roots of Anti-Semitism (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1984); David H. Bennet,
The Party of Fear (London: University of North Carolina Press, 1988), pp. 23-26,
205-06. Back to text
257. Daniel J. Boorstin, “History's Hidden Turning Points,”
U.S. News & World Report, April 22, 1991, cover story. Back to text
258. Ibid, p. 61. Back to text
259. David Fromkin, A Peace to End all Peace (New York: Avon
Books, 1989), pp. 468-69; Michael Kettle, The Allies and the Russian Collapse
(Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1981), p. 17. For how the
Protocols evolved further to support Fascism in Europe read F.L. Carsten, The
Rise of Fascism (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982), pp. 24, 29,
118. 184. The Thule Society's efforts to promote anti-Semitism through Hitler
would likely have not had much effect on the world except for Henry Ford,
through his Dearborn Independent newspaper, spreading those Protocols to every
corner of the world, and imprinting anti-Semitism into the world's mind (Pool
and Pool, Who Financed Hitler, pp. 3, 23, Chapter 3).Back to text
260. Litvinoff, Burning Bush. Back to text
261. EdmondTaylor, The Fall of the Dynasties: The Collapse
of the Old Order, 1905-1922 (New York: Dorset Press, 1989), Chapters 17-19.Back to text
262. Bennet, Party of Fear, pp. 191-98, 205-206. Back to text
263. Karl Polanyi, The Great Transformation (Boston: Beacon
Press, 1957), pp. 237-241; see also F. L. Carsten, Britain and the Weimar
Republic (New York: Schocken Books, 1984), especially Chapter 8; Carsten, Rise
of Fascism. Back to
264. Taylor, Fall of the Dynasties, p. 366. Back to text
265. Carsten, Rise of Fascism, pp.150-55. Back to text
266. Carsten, Weimar Republic , especially Chapter 8; also
Michael N. Dobbowski and Isodor Wallimann, Radical Perspectives on the Rise of
Fascism in Germany (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1989), especially pp.
194-209. Back to
267. J. Noakes and G. Pridham, eds., Nazism 1919 - 1945,
vol. 2 (New York: Schocken Books, 1988), p. 626.Back to text
268. Ibid Back to text
269. Pool and Pool, Who Financed Hitler? pp. 7-8, 19-21. Back to text
270. Burman, Inquisition ; Henry Charles Lea, The
Inquisition of the Middle Ages (New York: Citadel Press, 1954), a condensation
of his 1887 three-volume monumental work, A History of the Inquisition of the
Middle Ages. Back to
BLACK POPE of the Jesuits
Sun, 29 Aug 2004 16:18:00
"Black Pope"... was "monopoly of near.. everything"
This photo, taken
from The Saturday Evening Post, January 17, 1959, is of
"The Black Pope", who in 1963, reigned over his Jesuit Order - the
powerful Secret Society - and gave the command to assassinate
Knight of Columbus President John F. Kennedy.
The Twenty-Seventh Superior General of
The Society of Jesus
from 1946 to 1964;
ruled over Popes
Pius XII (Hitler's Pope), and
John XXIII (Khrushchev's Pope),
Paul VI (Johnson's Pope), including their hierarchies;
in command of the Masters of international Secret Societies including:
The Sovereign Military Order of Malta,
Scottish-Rite Shriner Freemasonry,
The Order of the Illuminati,
The Knights of Columbus,
The Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, B'nai B'rith
The Club of Rome, The Nation of Islam
and its private army called "The Fruit of Islam",
The Mafia Commission, and Opus Dei
along with a host of lesser brotherhoods.
Murderers and Traitors in the Assassination
and Cover-up of President John F. Kennedy.
In answer to:
Levi Philos <firstname.lastname@example.org> who wrote:
“Still others will tell you that the Pope was taken
1100 something and had to give power to the "Black Pope" whoever